I'm on a train heading South West to the Tuckers Malting Beer Festival  with the excuse of 'judging' at the Society of Independent Brewers  SW regional beer competition. Around 100 breweries will have entered  over 350 beers between them, each hoping to be judged 'best in class'  or, better still, 'best in competition'. There'll be around 40 judges  drawn mainly from the biz with a sprinkling of the worthy added in;  we'll be divided into groups, each with its own guiding chair and  a category to assess. Blind tasting will ensue with much sniffing,  swirling and swilling and marks given for such attributes as clarity,  aroma, and flavour. All the entered beers will be subjected to this  scrutiny, the lucky few going forward to a national final competition  next year and the winners of *that* will gain bragging rights over the  entire craft beer movement of England, Scotland and Wales (I imagine  it's only the pesky Irish sea that precludes Northern Ireland from our  association, though it may be a lack of breweries). In this highly  competitive industry such awards are generally considered to help out  the sales department enormously and, to an extent, this is true: the  process of selecting the winners is extremely vigorous, spanning over a  year, and the assessment of as many as 20 independent scrutineers - you  don't get lucky in this competition - the badge of merit is just that, a  mark of true quality. All this helps the cream rise to the top where  you, who just seeks a tasty beer, will be able to spot it and select it.  The beer award world is, like most such influential awards, flawed. Of  course it is, but it isn't damaged to such an extent that it ceases to  work, no,  no it works very well in fact.
But I feel uncomfortable  about it all, I always have done. Beer 'competition'? Beer can't  compete; nothing so profound is completely measurable. I can argue that  the appreciation of a beer is subjective, that we have differing  preferences, and I'd be partly right. You could counter by arguing that  it's objective, that the vast majority of us can tell a rotten beer  from a decent one. And you'd be partly right too. We could get bogged  down in this (Pirsig stuff) for some time and not actually reach a  conclusion, but we needn't, because it's superfluous to my point and  that is this: beer is not a simple, stand alone object in the same way  that, say, an eraser is. An erasure looks and works like one  pretty much wherever it is and whoever is using it. There are no  discernible outside influences altering the users perception and  performance of the erasure,  it's the same as it was, albeit possibly a little more worn, in a  previous time and place. Not so beer though - beer is beer, and mood,  and place, and company. Context is everything in beer - what's right one  day, in one place and with certain people is not necessarily as good  the next day, in a different place, all alone. I need only one example, a  single anecdote, to illustrate my point: the best beer I ever had? I  usually shy away, mumbling something about the one in my hand but that's a  cover-up: truly, the very best beer I ever had (well, it's up there) was a bottle of   Amstel, the Amsterdam brewed pilsner. I can't tell you about the malt  profile, or the blend of hops used to create this masterpiece, mainly  because the experience was over 20 years ago, but I can give you an idea  of the circumstance: the beer was ice cold, fresh from a large catering  fridge in the kitchen of a quayside taverna on the rocky Ithaca in the  Ionian Sea. There were perhaps ten of us, girls and boys on our summer  break from University, prime of our lives and having the time of our  lives. There was more than one bottle too - enough to quench the thirst  and lubricate social interaction for a number of weeks. Yes, Amstel  lager certainly did it for me that summer. Back home, and before the season completely finished, I chose a warm West London day to treat my  mate to a couple of chilled down Amstels I'd secreted in the union bar  ice machine. And though it tasted good, it wasn't the same, not at all  the same. It never could be the same.
So though it is possible to  'judge' the merit of beer it feels entirely inappropriate to do so. An  act of sacrilege would be putting it too strongly, perhaps, but it is  wrong. Wrong wrong wrong. But since my trip is an excuse to enjoy a  little travel, meeting old friends and making new ones whilst supping a  couple of pints of the local, I'll forgive myself.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment